|
Updated Questions and Answers Regarding PAHP Program – 4/25/07
1. Is the list
of outpatient medical services an exhaustive list? Are they the only services
provided by our our psychiatrists and ARNPs that KHS will compensate and
are the stated rates final?
Response: The list that was previous posted as a working draft has been
updated and finalized, and that updated draft is available on this site
as “Updated
List of Covered Services And Rates – April 2007”.
2. I see that
peer support is included in the PAHP. Where would I go to find more information
on exactly what kinds of peer support – if that has already been finalized.
If not yet final, I would like to have an opportunity to say some things
about it that I hope would be beneficial.
Response: In addition to the description of this service included at
Appendix F to the PAHP contract on this site, and the outcome requirements
associated with the service included in the PAHP contract, operational
information about that service for Kansas will soon be available on this
site.
3. The contract on page
69, section c states, "The Contractor shall identify people with high
needs, initiiate ongoing treatment coordination and ensure provider treatment
planning and service coordination--" Then in section d. "In order
to identify Members with special mental heqalth treatment needs, the Contractor
is required to identify Members who meet the state approved criteria for
SPMI, or SED; OR have a dual diagnosis--" Does this indicate that people
with cooccurring disorders will be considered part of the target population
and, therefore be qualified for CPST, TCM etc.? If so and in that context
how is dual diagnosis defined?
Response: No, it does not mean that people with co-occurring service
needs are part of the mental health target population. It does mean
that specific attention will be given by both the PAHP contractor and the
PIHP contractor, in close collaboration with SRS program staff setting
policy direction for both programs, to meet the needs of people with co-occurring
disorders in increasingly effective ways.
4. Explain
the Medicaid cash flow of the PAHP, specifically the funding for the Rehabilitation
Services; the funding for the SED/HCBS waiver and the funding for the Outpatient
Services.
Response: The PAHP will be paid a per member per month fee and
will pay the providers from these payments. The PAHP will reconcile
quarterly with SRS on the payments based on a Medicaid fee schedule of
services provided.
5. What is the definition
of Medical Necessity that will be used by Kansas Health Solutions, LLC to
determine services?
Response: When determining the medical necessity for mental health services,
the Contractor shall:
- A. Use Kansas definition of medical
necessity when determining the need for T-XIX State Plan, 1915 (b) 3,
and HCBS SED Waiver mental health services.
- B. Use the SRS-approved functional assessment tools for determining
the need for Community Based Rehabilitation Services, 1915(b)3 services,
and HCBS SED Waiver mental health services
- C. Use
the Kansas HCBS SED Waiver clinical eligibility criteria when determining
the need for HCBS SED Waiver services.
MEDICAL NECESSITY means that a clinical intervention for an otherwise
covered category of service, is not specifically excluded from coverage,
and is medically necessary, according to all of the following criteria:
- Authority. The clinical intervention is recommended by the treating
clinician and is determined to be necessary by the Secretary or the
Secretary's designee.
- Purpose. The clinical intervention has the purpose of treating
a medical condition/mental illness.
- Scope. The clinical intervention provides the most appropriate
supply or level of service, considering potential benefits and harms
to the client.
- Evidence. The clinical intervention is known to be effective in
improving health outcomes. The scientific evidence for each existing
intervention shall be considered first and, to the extent possible,
shall be the basis for determinations of medical necessity. If no scientific
evidence is available, professional standards of care shall be considered.
If professional standards of care do not exist, or are outdated or
contradictory, decisions about existing interventions shall be based
on expert opinion. Coverage of existing interventions shall not be
denied solely on the basis that there is an absence of conclusive scientific
evidence. Existing interventions may be deemed to meet this regulation's
definition of medical necessity in the absence of scientific evidence
if there is a strong consensus of effectiveness and benefit expressed
through up-to-date and consistent professional standards of care or,
in the absence of those standards, convincing expert opinion.
- Value. The clinical intervention is cost-effective for this condition
compared to alternative interventions, including no intervention. The
term “Cost-effective'' shall not necessarily be construed to
mean lowest price. An intervention may be clinically indicated and
yet not be a covered benefit or meet the definition of medical necessity.
Interventions that do not meet the definition of medical necessity
may be covered at the choice of the Secretary or the Secretary's designee.
An intervention shall be considered cost-effective if the benefits
and harms relative to costs represent an economically efficient use
of resources for members with this condition. In the application of
this criterion to an individual case, the characteristics of the individual
member shall be determinative. “Medical necessity in psychiatric
situations'' means that there is medical documentation that indicates
that the person could be harmful to himself or herself or others if
not under psychiatric treatment or that the person is disoriented in
time, place, or person.
6. What are the anticipated
changes in how the CMHC’s will serve the targeted populations, (SPMI
and SED clients) when the new Medicaid State Plan is implemented?
Response: There is no expected change to how the CMHC’s will serve
these targeted populations, other then if they don’t have the capacity
to serve them then they can contract out for other providers or they
can open their area up to the PAHP to contract with providers to
meet the demand.
Here is a summary of how SRS expects that the various categories of
services will be provided:
Reserved to CMHCs unless need for other providers arises:
Rehabilitation Services – includes these
services
- Community Psychiatric Support and Treatment (child, adult, and EBPs)
- Psychosocial Rehabilitation (individual, child group, and adult group)
- Peer Support (individual and group)
- Crisis Intervention (emergent and ongoing, rates varied by professional)
Targeted Case Management
Attendant Care (for other than HCBS SED waiver
eligibles)
HCBS-SED Waiver Services – includes
- Parent Support and Training (individual and group)
- Independent Living/Skills Building
- Short Term Respite Care
- Wrap Around Facilitation
- Professional Resource Family Care (Crisis Stabilization)
- Attendant Care
Open to all associating providers:
Outpatient Therapy – includes services
by LMHPs such as
- Admission/diagnostic evaluation
- Psychological testing
- Individual, family (including in-home) and group psychotherapy
Outpatient Medical Services – includes
services by physician, PA, ARNP, RN such as
- Individual psychotherapy by physician, PA, ARNP, RN
- Office consultation
- Limited medication management
Kan-be-Healthy Services – includes
- Mental health assessment (limited and extended)
- Mental health service plan development by LMHP
Case Conference
7. How are the CMHC’s
preparing to help clients who will be affected understand what changes will
happen and when to expect the changes to happen? How will CMHC’s
respond to the client who asks, “How will this affect me and the
services I get now?”
Response: The Kansas Health Solutions will provide information concerning
the provision of mental health services to all Medicaid eligible individuals
through a beneficiary handbook. They will also have ombudsmen, a
toll free number and other outreach activities.
8. What is the plan to provide
Peer Support services to the adult population and is this part of the State
Medicaid Plan or is it part of something else?
Response: Peer support is a part of the Medicaid Plan. This is
a rehabilitation service that will be provided by the CMHCs. In addition
one of SRS’s
University contractors is developing a peer support training program with
the CROs.
9. Who is the associate
provider: the CMHC or each qualified staff person employed by the CMHC?
Response: The CMHCs will be providers signed up by the PAHP,
all the licensed staff will have to be credentialed by the PAHP.
10. Who provides the services
for SED/HCBS waiver?
Response: Please see response to question #6 above for SRS expectations
for specific categories of services.
11. Talk about why the case manager
must be a different person than the community psychiatric support treatment
(CPST). How will the need for two staff persons be handled in the rural
parts of the state?
Response: Per CMS rules, individuals who provide Targeted Case Management
Services to a participant may not provide other direct services to that
participant.
12. When will the Associate Provider
Agreements be available to private practice clinicians for their consideration? How
closely will the Associate Provider Agreements mirror the CMHC state licensure
rules and regulations?
Response: It is expected these will be available by mid April. The
CMHC licensing requirements apply only to the CMHCs.
13. What is the rationale for
SRS to monitor the Associate Providers (private practitioners)?
Response: SRS will not “monitor” the private practitioners,
but the PAHP will like any other Managed Care Organization conduct quality
assurance and utilization management activities. This information
will be provided to SRS as our oversight responsibilities of the PAHP. Part
of SRS’s
overall program accountability program will include random review of all
activities associated with the contract and service system.
14. Why is there reference to
Qualified Mental Health Practitioner (QMHP) in the documents regarding services?
Response: The State Psychiatric Hospital screenings by statute must be
completed by a QMHP. All other references to QMHP allow an LMHP to
be designated by the PAHP as necessary.
15. What are the performance indicators
of services?
Response: Attachment K to the PAHP contract, found at this site, outlines
the performance indicators that will be monitored.
16. How do you
anticipate the PAHP contract (KS Health Solutions) and the PIHP contract
(ValueOptions) interfacing and working with one another?
Response: Both contracts have language in them that they each have to
work together to ensure services to the dual diagnosed. Now that both contractors
have been selected conversations have started between them and SRS program staff.
17. Situational
Examples: As of July 1 and beyond: A current Medicaid
client is receiving rehabilitation services and they want to start receiving
their care from a private practitioner in their community. The private
practitioner has already become an Associate Provider. Can this consumer
begin receiving the rehabilitation services from the private provider who
is an Associate Provider to the PAHP, Kansas Health Solutions, LLC?
Response: No they will continue receiving services from the CMHCs
18. A Medicaid client has been
seeing a private provider for therapy for three months. The clinician
sees that the client is progressing in therapy but is in need of support
services. She lets her client know to contact the local CMHC to get
services going. How will the coordination of services occur?
Response: If support services are rehabilitation services the person
can either be referred to the local CMHC or to the PAHP. Coordination
of services will have to be through a shared treatment plan.
19. A Medicaid client has contacted
a private provider who is an Associate Provider. The client wants care
from this particular private provider and wants to have nothing to do with
the local community mental health center based on previous experience with
them. Does this client have to interact, in any way, with the local
CMHC to gain mental health care from the private provider?
Response: They would still have to receive rehabilitation services from
a CMHC, but if they didn’t want to use their local CMHC they could
select another one. If they don’t need rehabilitation services
they can use any provider in the network, with out interacting with the
CMHC.
20. Since the CMHC’s will
be determining whether or not they have the capacity to meet the service
needs of clients, what is to prevent the center from claiming that they have
adequate enough resources and that they do not need associate providers to
provide any of the Outpatient Services?
Response: Access, and the attendant service capacity needed
to ensure access, will be measured by the Performance Indicators and related
standards included in the PAHP contract. The Performance Indicators
can be seen at Appendix K of the PAHP contract, which can be viewed at www.medicaidtraining.org,
by clicking on “PAHP Contract”. The Network Access
Requirements, applicable to all providers (both CMHCs and independent practitioners)
are also included in the Liquidated Damages section of the PAHP contract,
at pages 147-148. Adequate service access is not dependent upon
any entity “claiming” anything.
21. What will be the standard
of measurement that the PAHP/Kansas Health Solutions use to confirm what
the CMHC claims?
Response: Again, any entity’s “claims” will
not be a relevant factor. Rather, the outcomes of the PAHP contractor,
consistent with the Performance Indicators and related standards in the
PAHP contract, will be the governing measurements.
22. How will PAHP/Kansas Health
Solutions intervene when the CMHC says they do not need an associate provider
to provider a service, but the needed service for a client is not being delivered?
Response: SRS has contract with Kansas Health Solutions to serve
as the PAHP, and has included in that contract the uniformly applicable
service and access standards which will be measured and reported according
to the specific terms of the contract. The PAHP is required to proactively
assess the ensure the adequacy of the provider network, and one of the
governing principals of the contract, stated at page 17, is that “If
access problems are detected, the PAHP must actively recruit, train, and
subcontract with additional providers including independent practitioners
to meet the needs of members.” If an access standard (or any
other standard) of the contract is not being met, the contractually described
corrective action and damages provisions will be utilized. Ultimately,
SRS will make a determination of provider network adequacy, based on evaluation
of member needs, consumer grievances, and the access and other system performance
indicator findings.
23. Since the CMHC will screen
Medicaid clients to determine medical necessity and then the array of needed
services, what is to prevent the CMHC from determining that the client only
needs the services that the CMHC can provide?
Response: This question seems to presume several personal and
system characteristics which the PAHP contract and structure do not presume. For
example, a core value of the public mental health system in Kansas is that
consumers will direct their care; the contract requires that consumers
have access to information about what services are available and what providers
are available, and that they have consistent, strong access to those services
as well as choice among qualified providers; the contract allows for any
qualified subcontracting provider from whom a consumer seeks service to
perform the necessary evaluation and, if medical necessity is indicated,
provide the services they are qualified to provide, up to the preauthorization
limits; and anticipates that there will be increasingly strong connections
across and between service systems to support a variety of consumer needs. In
addition, as in all health care delivered by licensed and certified professionals,
there is a measure of professional ethics and licensing competence that
guides the behavior of the professionals that will be providing mental
health services; and, under the PAHP contract there is a required utilization
management – including fraud and abuse – process that will
be utilized to help ensure the propriety of all service providers.
24. Since it has been possible
all along for the CMHC’s to contract with a private provider to provide
services, including for an individual with Medicaid, but they have chosen
not to reach out into the community of private providers, how will this mindset
change after July 1?
Response: In addition to the response immediately above: Whatever
mindset may exist today or on July 1st, there is a dramatically different
infrastructure, supported by a binding contract, governed by specific federal
regulatory standards, and reinforced by words and actions of SRS in managing
the public mental health system. SRS expects that the PAHP contractor
and all of the subcontracting providers will operate in good faith to fulfill
the potential of this infrastructure for the benefit of people needing
mental health services.
25. What will be the standard
measurement of prompt service delivery? For example, how long must
a client wait for an appointment for services to begin, after the initial
screening for medical necessity and determination of needed services?
Response: The service access standards are set out in the PAHP
contract, as noted above, both in the Performance Indicators requirements
and the liquidated damages section. In summary, these standards are:
Network Access Requirement
Contractor shall assure that Members
access services consistent with the standards relative to the urgency of
the Members’ service need.
|
Access
|
Referral
|
Assessment and/or Treatment
|
|
Post-stabilization services
|
1 hour
|
- within 1 hour from referral for post-stabilization services
(both inpatient and outpatient) in an emergency room
|
|
Emergent
|
Immediate
|
- within 3 hours for an outpatient mental health services and,
- within 1 hour from referral for an emergent concurrent utilization
review screen
|
|
Urgent
|
24 hours
|
- 48 hours from referral for outpatient mental health services
and
- within 24 hours from referral for an urgent concurrent
utilization review screen
|
|
Plannned inpatient psychiatric
|
48 hours
|
- 5 working days from referral.
|
|
Routine Outpatient
|
5 days
|
- 9 working days from referral
- 10 working days from previous treatment
|
Damages
One thousand dollars ($1,000) per month
shall be assessed, at SRS’s discretion, for each of the 8 standards
that are not met at least 95 percent of the time for the preceding month.
26. When an Associate Provider
(private practitioner) is providing Outpatient Services, who owns the client
record? Who is responsible for HIPAA compliance for the general record
and specifically the psychotherapy records and notes?
Response: Generally, service providers must retain responsibility
for their service records and for compliance with HIPAA and other patient
or consumer record protection standards; and, service providers must be
accountable to the service monitors and funders (here, including the PAHP
contractor and SRS) by – in part – appropriate access to treatment
records. The specific requirements of the PAHP about record access
will be included as part of the provider subcontract.
27. Who owns the Treatment/Intervention
Plan?
Response: Generally, the Kansas public mental health system
value is that consumers should be effectively supported to be informed
about and direct their treatment plan. Providers are responsible
to assist consumers in that informing process and then to operate within
the boundaries of their professional ethics, licensing requirements, and
contract agreements.
28. Please talk more about case
management and targeted case management. What is the difference between
case management, targeted case management, and CPST?
Response: There is no more “case management” in the
Kansas public mental health system. That phrase had gotten confused
in the operational culture of the system, whereby two separate services
(CPST and targeted case management) had gotten somewhat blurred in some
instances. Effective 7/1/07, the service definitions for CPST services
and targeted case management services – including the prohibition
against a single provider delivering both services to the same consumer – will
govern. Those definitions are available for review at Appendix F
to the PAHP contract.
29. Are advisory committees being
formed for the PAHP/Kansas Health Solutions and/or SRS as implementation
of the State Medicaid Plan and the new Freedom of Choice Waiver gets underway
on July 1? How can one get involved/appointed to serve
on such an advisory committee? What is the schedule and location of
these meetings?
Response: Extensive stakeholder involvement was obtained prior
to building the PAHP contract and related infrastructure. Going
forward, generally there will be three informing bodies that will assist
in the readiness for and then implementation of the Mental Health and Substance
Abuse 1915(b)/(c) waiver:
1. Consistent
with the PAHP contract, and to accommodate implementation of the contract,
SRS and KHS have jointly developed an operational implementation committee
with representatives of both parties. Decisions of the committee
will be informed by stakeholders. One significant way stakeholders
will inform the implementation phase is by the stakeholder meeting KHS
is sponsoring on the afternoon of 4/20/07, to review and comment upon several
critical implementation documents that will guide both provider and member
interactions. Additional updates about readiness activities will
be available at the KHS web site, www.kansashealthsolutions.com,
and at www.medicaidtraining.org
2. SRS
will be establishing a statewide quality committee to review PAHP performance
issues and advise SRS about those issues. This committee has not
yet been established, and if you are interested in participating you can
express that interest to Kathy Mosher, who is the PAHP program contact,
at 785.296.7272.
3. SRS
also intends to utilize an Oversight Committee appointed by SRS Secretary
and supported by SRS Health Care Policy Administration staff. That
committee: strategically assesses SRS implementation of PAHP/PIHP
programs; meets quarterly; reports to SRS Secretary, Legislature, CMS,
and system stakeholders.
|