|
Recipient Monitoring
Policy
Original Effective Date: March 22, 2000
Rev. 2003; Approved by Audit Committee on November 12, 2003
Rev. 2007; Approved by Audit Committee on June 22, 2007
Purpose:
This document replaces Secretary’s Letter 544 dated May 27,
1999 regarding responsibilities for obtaining independent audits on grants
and contracts awarded by SRS. It defines the responsibilities for monitoring
recipients of Department funding (direct and pass-through) and expands the
monitoring requirements to cover all awards of that funding. (See definition
of award below.) This policy is effective beginning
with fiscal years beginning July 1, 2007.
Background and Definitions: As defined in the OMB Circulars, award means
financial assistance and cost-reimbursement contracts that non-Federal entities
receive directly from Federal awarding agencies or indirectly from pass-through
entities, that provide support or stimulation to accomplish a public purpose,
which include grants and other agreements in the form of money or property
in lieu of money, by the government to an eligible recipient. It does not include
procurement contracts, under grants or contracts, used to buy goods or services
from vendors. Any audits of such vendors shall be covered by the terms
and conditions of the contract.
Regarding the use of grants and cooperative agreements, and contracts, the
Federal awarding agency shall decide on the appropriate award instrument
(i.e., grant, cooperative agreement, or contract). The Federal Grant
and Cooperative Agreement Act (31 U.S.C. 6301-08) governs the use of grants,
cooperative agreements and contracts. A grant or cooperative agreement
shall be used only when the principal purpose of a transaction is to accomplish
a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by Federal statute. The
statutory criterion for choosing between grants and cooperative agreements
is that for the latter, “substantial involvement is expected between
the executive agency and the State, local government, or other recipient
when carrying out the activity contemplated in the agreement.” Contracts
shall be used when the principal purpose is acquisition of property or services
for the direct benefit or use of the Federal Government.”
For purposes of this document, the term “recipient” refers to
those entities receiving funding (direct and pass-through) through the Department
of Social and Rehabilitation Services.
Monitoring Policy Requirements:
- Non-Federal entities that expend $500,000 or more in
a year in Federal awards (total of all applicable
federal awards) shall have a single or program-specific
audit conducted for that year in accordance with the provisions
of OMB Circular A-133. In addition to the
requirements of the A-133 audit, recipients may be asked to conduct a
separate limited scope engagement with agreed-upon procedures. These
additional procedures will be designated in the terms and conditions
of the award.
Limited scope audits with agreed-upon procedures should
be conducted in accordance with either the AICPA’s generally accepted
auditing standards or attestation standards.
The A-133 audit shall be completed
and submitted to SRS within the earlier of 30 days after receipt of the
auditor’s report(s), or nine months
after the end of the audit period. Any limited scope audit reports
with agreed-upon procedures should be submitted in accordance with the submission
date set by program staff.
The cost for the single audit may be charged against
the Federal award. Additional
requirements imposed by SRS, and the resulting audit work necessary to achieve
them, would not be able to be charged against the Federal award but would
be able to be charged against the State portion of that award.
- Entities that expend less than $500,000 in a year in Federal awards
or State awards shall have a limited scope engagement with agreed-upon
procedures or be subject to internal monitoring performed by SRS staff determined
at the time of the negotiation of the award.
Limited scope engagements
with agreed-upon procedures should be conducted in accordance with either
the AICPA’s generally accepted auditing standards
or attestation standards.
All limited scope engagement reports
shall be completed and submitted as specified within the award document. These
limited scope engagements may include
at a minimum:
- A financial audit of the Center conducted in accordance with generally
accepted auditing standards. It should assess the extent to which
the Center’s financial reports fairly reflect the Center’s
financial condition and include a statement of financial position, statement
of activities, and statement of cash flows. There shall also be
(1) a schedule of award expenditures for the period covered by the recipient’s
financial statements, (2) a schedule of findings and questioned costs,
and (3) a summary schedule of prior audit findings.
- A report on internal controls and a report on compliance to the award
terms and conditions.
- The report on compliance shall address one or more of the following
types of compliance requirements: activities allowed or unallowed;
allowable costs/cost principles; eligibility; matching, level of effort,
earmarking; and reporting; or whatever compliance requirements are specified
in the award document or applicable OMB Compliance Supplement.
- Any correspondence (e.g., management letters) from the auditor associated
with the audit.
- A review of performance measures if the federal or state award document
requires these to be audited and reported upon. The recipient
of the award will have to report those performance measures either through
their independent audit or through another entity designated by SRS.
- A detailed schedule of revenues and expenditures by line item if specified
in the award document. This schedule must be prepared with reasonable
assurance by the auditor. If line item detail is not required,
management should ensure a schedule is prepared listing total revenues
and total expenditures (state share and federal share) for each award.
If the award covers multiple years, each year should be reported separately
on the schedule. Again, the auditor should apply procedures to
this schedule to determine if they can provide reasonable assurance on
its contents.
The cost for a limited scope engagement may only be charged against the state award. The limited scope engagement may be conducted by either an independent auditing firm or by the SRS Office of Audit and Consulting Services.
Internal monitoring conducted by SRS may include reviewing reports submitted by the recipient, performing site visits to review financial and programmatic records and observe operations, reviewing the recipient’s single audit or program-specific audit results, and evaluating audit findings and the recipient’s corrective action plan. Internal monitoring can be done by SRS program staff or could also include audits/monitoring by the SRS Office of Audit and Consulting Services.
Action Needed:
Audits required above shall be completed and submitted to SRS within the
earlier of 30 days after receipt of the auditor’s report(s), or nine
months after the end of the audit period. If SRS program staff
have set a submission date for audit reports that is less than the requirement
noted here, audits should be submitted to comply with those instructions. SRS
staff shall be given access, when requested, to all working papers prepared
in the independent audit.
Audit reports should be forwarded to: The Department of Social & Rehabilitation
Services, Office of Audit and Consulting Services, Docking State Office Building,
8th Fl, 915 S.W. Harrison, Topeka, Kansas 66612. They may also
be sent electronically to OACS@srskansas.org. Questions
regarding this policy may be directed to the SRS Office of Audit and Consulting
Services, SRS program staff, or the SRS Grants and Contracts Unit. Payments
resulting from award closeout activities should be made payable to SRS and
sent to the SRS Grants and Contracts Unit, Attn: Grants and Contracts Supervisor,
Docking State Office Building, 8th Fl., 915 S.W. Harrison, Topeka, Kansas
66612.
|