|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Several issues have surfaced regarding Medicaid eligible age 21 and 65 and older who are admitted to State psychiatric hospitals under court order and apply for assistance. Of particular concern was how to delineate those admittances where law enforcement custody is a factor, thus resulting in ineligibility per KEESM 8111.1. Our policy in this area has been based on HCFA's interpretation of the Medicaid regulation which prohibits the availability of FFP for services provided to individuals who are inmates of public institutions. Individuals who are under the jurisdiction of the criminal justice system are deemed to be inmates of public institutions as they are normally held in jails or other penal facilities pending court appearances, trials, and sentencing as well as after conviction, if guilty. It does not matter whether the individual has merely been accused of a crime or convicted and sentenced. The deciding factor is his or her incarceration in a public institution. The only permitted exceptions are for individuals on probation, parole, or bail and those who have been pardoned and released. Staff in some areas have interpreted the provisions of KEESM 8111.1 to deny medical assistance to potentially eligible persons who enter the three State psychiatric hospitals under any court order. Part of the confusion centers around the fact that a great number of admittances occur under the jurisdiction of the District Court. Some result from civil procedures such as those falling under the heading of "protective custody" while others are indeed criminal in nature such as pre-sentence evaluations and determinations of competency to stand trial. What needs to be clarified is the fact that eligibility is allowable for persons admitted under a civil court order. Although a law enforcement official may have been involved in the detainment process, the person subsequently falls under the protective custody of the court. Those admissions which fall under the Kansas Code of Criminal Procedure are to be generally viewed as falling under the care, custody, and control of law enforcement officials and, thus, would result in ineligibility. This distinction is extremely important as it appears we have wrongly denied Medicaid to otherwise eligible persons in a number of instances and have therefore lost out on FFP coverage for their cost of care. On the reverse side is a complete listing of patients commitment status options used by the state hospitals which identifies the type of admittance and the state statute it falls under for both the adult and juvenile criminal justice system. The right hand column denotes those admittances where Medicaid eligibility would be denied.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||