What is Family Centered Systems of Care?
Family Centered Systems of Care (FCSOC) is not just a program, it is a concept, a process. FCSOC provides collaboration between agencies, service clubs, the faith community,tribal organizations, etc., to develop common values and visions that are family focused and family driven. As a result of the collaboration barriers break down, communications improve, and we all work together so that our community serves children and families together and in their best interest. At the family level this can be done by using family meetings and or wraparound process. In a system of care, mental health, education, child welfare, juvenile justice, and other agencies work together to ensure that children and their families have access to the services and supports they need to succeed. A true system of care is about partnership - a partnership made up of service providers, families, teachers, and others who care for a child. The partnership assist in developing an individualized service plan that builds on the unique strengths of each child and each family. This customized plan is always implemented in a way that is consistent with the family's culture and language. The primary goal is for the family to get the services they need in or near their home and community. Teams find and build upon the strengths of a child and his or her family, rather than focusing solely on their problems. Teams work with individual families including the children-and with other caregivers as partners when developing a plan for the child and when making decisions affecting his or her care. Family Centered Practice (FCP) Family-Centered Systems of Care Practice and Child Welfare The idea of involving the family as a part of valid intervention in child welfare is still relatively new when compared to other, well-established modes of practice. Traditionally, child welfare efforts were child focused. They were intended to protect, provide care for, and plan for children who were separated from their parents because of abandonment or abuse and who were living in some form of out-of-home care. Children were seen as victims of bad or incompetent parents and the solution to the maltreatment problem was to separate the children from their parents, placing them in the hands of foster care providers. The intent was to force parents to learn to become better parents. Parents were given conditions that had to be met before being reunited with their children. These conditions might include getting a job, cleaning up their apartments, learning better parenting skills, or engaging in counseling to solve the underlying problems that were thought to cause them to be abusive and neglectful. Many of the parents became labeled as "unmotivated," "resistant," and "in denial" or refusing to "assume responsibility" of their problems. As a result of this approach, an increasing number of children were found to be drifting in foster care, often subjected to repeated re-placement, ultimately losing the affectional ties, but not the legal bonds, that linked them to their families. These children had no hope of either going home again or gaining permanency through adoption. Still others, largely because of race or ethnicity-mainly African Americans, Hispanics, and Native Americans-became over represented because of child welfare's historic misunderstanding of their needs. As a result of the 1980 Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act (PL 96-272), the Family Preservation and Support Act of 1993 (PL 103-66), and the Safe and Stable Family Program in 1997, the scope and purposes of child welfare programs require a comprehensive plan of family-centered services:
The basic concepts and values of family-centered practice are influenced by family systems and ecological theories. Family systems theory assumed that emotional and behavioral problems of individuals are maintained through patterns of interaction within the family. Thus, the goal of intervention is to evaluate and change these patterns of behavior and to help the family interact in more effective ways. Ecological theories emphasize that the behavior of individuals and families is a function of their adaptation to the demands of the broader context. Thus, the approach to intervention includes strengthening the interactions between the family and other systems (for example, informal helpers, community agencies, and schools) that have an impact on their lives. They believe that these other systems in the community are an integral part of the decision-making and intervention process. In practice, shifting the focus from the child to the family has often been viewed in child welfare as creating a dichotomy between the goals of protecting children and preserving and supporting families. But effective family-centered practice depends on a clear understanding of the relationship between these two goals. The belief that the best approach to protect children is to strengthen families acknowledges that there are times in the lives of families when they may be weak from exposure to stressors such as poverty, poor housing, substance abuse, domestic violence, or mental illness. Furthermore, help and timely intervention may not be available, some families may respond minimally or not at all to efforts to help them; and still others may require long-term help and support. Consequently, it becomes necessary to determine if out-of-home care is needed. When it is the plan of choice, the task is to manage placements in ways that minimize, as far as possible, the pain and bewilderment of separation and assure that children who go into care will be protected and well nurtured pending completion of a permanent plan. The Essential Components of Family-Centered Practice in Child Welfare
Family-centered practice in child welfare prescribes a continuum of services at five levels of intervention:
To be successful, family-centered practice requires a different organization and management structure-a way of working with other agencies. It is, in essence, a different way of doing business. |
||||||
|
|